TelecomTV TelecomTV
  • News
  • Videos
  • Channels
  • Events
  • Directory
  • Smart Studio
  • Surveys
  • Debates
  • Perspectives
  • DSP Leaders World Forum
  • DSP Leaders
  • Great Telco Debate
    • |
    • Follow
    • |
    • Subscribe
  • |
  • More
  • Webcasts
  • Surveys
  • Debates
  • Perspectives
  • Great Telco Debate
  • |
  • Follow TelecomTV
  • |
    • Subscribe
    • |
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Help
  • Contact
  • Follow TelecomTV
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Help
  • Contact
  • Sign In Register Subscribe
    • Subscribe
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Telco & CSP

Telco & CSP

Bouygues bids a merger with SFR

Ian Scales
By Ian Scales

Mar 6, 2014

Bouygues is offering €10.5 billion for SFR to merge with it, and claims the two together could generate extra cash and make savings of about €10 billion. Bouygues’ offer follows on from an original bid from Altice, the cable holding company of billionaire, Patrick Drahi, which values SFR at around €15 billion. Just to add some extra spice, market experts say they wouldn’t rule out other bidders entering the competition too: in particular they finger Vodafone, flush with cash and presumably ready to spend if in a good cause.

The unfolding drama will be testing time for France’s competition authorities since such a merger would drop France back to just three networks - almost certainly not enough to ensure robust, long-term competition in the Franch mobile market.

But that’s the point of course. Orange’s chief executive, Stéphane Richard, has recently been calling for consolidation in the market even though, in France, it could create a serious competitor to Orange. A larger and invigorated number two is still preferable, apparently, to a disruptive number 4, in the shape of Free, whose extreme price-cutting had upset the cosy, high-priced mobile market that pertained in France two years ago. Free at number 3 might be easier to accomodate.

M. Richard has been arguing that too much competition means the groups aren’t making enough money to reinvest in the networks. It’s an argument that seems to gain political traction in France with politicians wading in and promising ‘action’ against low prices and supposed network underinvestment.

So the scene is set for a test of political strength when it comes to flagging through the merger. On one side: much of the political establishment and the big telecoms groups, on the other the French competition authorities and, presumably, Iliad (which owns Free, the original price disrupter).

Related Topics
  • Analysis & Opinion,
  • Europe,
  • News,
  • Telco & CSP

More Like This

Access Evolution

DISH to acquire Republic Wireless

Mar 8, 2021

Sustainability

The post-pandemic home is on the way

Mar 8, 2021

Access Evolution

Nokia to supply Cibicom with mission critical LTE network across Denmark

Mar 8, 2021

Security

US hopes new law will help counter the global expansion of Chinese comms technology

Mar 8, 2021

Access Evolution

What’s up with… BT, Coherent, MWC21

Mar 8, 2021

Email Newsletters

Stay up to date with the latest industry developments: sign up to receive TelecomTV's top news and videos plus exclusive subscriber-only content direct to your inbox – including our daily news briefing and weekly wrap.

Subscribe

Top Picks

Highlights of our content from across TelecomTV today

15:12

Deutsche Telekom's Abdurazak Mudesir on the expanding Open RAN ecosystem

38:41

The pros and cons of open DSP architectures

10:32

Vodafone UK's Andrea Dona on Open RAN's progress

49:54

Open RAN: what’s the plan for 2021?

  • TelecomTV
  • Decisive Media

TelecomTV is produced by the team at Decisive Media

Menu
  • News
  • Videos
  • Channels
  • Directory
  • Smart Studio
 
  • Surveys
  • Debates
  • Perspectives
  • Events
  • About Us
Our Brands
  • TelecomTV Tracker
  • TelecomTV Perspectives
  • DSP Leaders
  • DSP Leaders World Forum
  • The Great Telco Debate
Get In Touch
[email protected]
+44 (0) 207 448 1070

Request a Media Pack

Follow
  • © Decisive Media Limited 2021. All rights reserved. All brands and products are the trademarks of their respective holder(s).
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Legal Notices