TelecomTV TelecomTV
  • News
  • Videos
  • Channels
  • Events
  • Network Partners
  • Industry Insights
  • Directory
  • Newsletters
  • Digital Platforms and Services
  • Open RAN
  • Cloud Native Telco
  • Telcos and Public Cloud
  • The Green Network
  • Private Networks
  • Open Telco Infra
  • 5G Evolution
  • Access Evolution
  • Edgenomics
  • Network Automation
  • 6G Research and Innovation
  • Security
  • More Topics
  • Network Partners
  • Industry Insights
  • Directory
  • Newsletters
  • |
  • About
  • Contact
  • |
  • Connect with us
  • Digital Platforms and Services
  • Open RAN
  • Cloud Native Telco
  • Telcos and Public Cloud
  • The Green Network
  • Private Networks
  • Open Telco Infra
  • 5G Evolution
  • Access Evolution
  • Edgenomics
  • Network Automation
  • 6G Research & Innovation
  • Security
  • Connect with TelecomTV
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Help
  • Contact
  • Sign In Register Subscribe
    • Subscribe
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

NFV

NFV

So you thought you knew what CNTT stood for…

Ray Le Maistre
By Ray Le Maistre

Jul 3, 2020

  • Used to be the Common NFVi Telco Taskforce
  • Now it’s the Cloud iNfrastructure Telco Taskforce
  • Shift in name comes as operators lean towards containers and Kubernetes

“What’s in a name?” wrote a certain William Shakespeare as he told the story of Romeo and Juliet. “Quite a lot,” is the answer we’d give, and we’re pretty sure we’d be backed up by the likes of Oozi Cats (former CEO of IoT module company Telit), whose moniker you wouldn't forget in a hurry.

So when we saw that CNTT, the industry initiative run jointly by the GSMA and LF Networking (and supported by OPNFV), had retained its initials but changed its name in late May from ‘Common NFVi Telco Taskforce’ to ‘Cloud iNfrastructure Telco Taskforce’, we wondered why, especially as the initiative was still in its relative infancy (about one year old). 

In June 2019, the group was officially launched/announced with this aim: “The CNTT will work closely with global service providers to define and create VNF reference architectures for NFVi (consisting of a global NFVi reference model, reference architecture, and global VNF certification lifecycle). The common NFVi reference architectures will be submitted to LFN for testing and verification via the OPNFV Verification Program (OVP).”

So has anything changed other than the name? 

LF Networking provided the following explanation: “We decided to change the name to better reflect what role the group plays in the open source community and more closely tie the name to our actual objectives.  We are focused on establishing reference models and architectures for infrastructure to support cloud-based applications, in whatever form they take. We wanted to keep the CNTT acronym because so many in the Open Source community are familiar with it.”

The timing of the name change came in the same month as the initiative’s release called Baldy, which includes its first container-based reference architecture (RA-2), a significant step into the cloud native realm. (See diagram above.)

Get the lowdown on Baldy and the latest CNTT developments in this blog.

And it looks like that focus on a reference architecture for cloud native functions was likely what spurred the shift to a name that reflected a broader approach to telco cloud architectures, rather than one more closely associated with the nomenclature of the original NFV efforts spawned by the work at ETSI.

It was clear also that even by last September/October, the greater excitement about the work of CNTT among those attending industry events such as the Open Networking Summit Europe gathering in Antwerp, where the first OpenStack-based reference architecture was unveiled, was around reference architecture 2 for Kubernetes-based cloud native deployments.

The good news is that we can all still refer to CNTT -- which currently boasts a host of active Tier 1 operator participants (AT&T, China Mobile, Orange, STC, Verizon, Vodafone, Telstra and more) -- and continue to track its developments, especially as it now has three workstreams – one on OpenStack, one on containers managed by Kubernetes, and one on telco edge architectures. 

And the CNTT team was due to have taken part in the recent virtual PlugTest organized by ETSI: We look forward to hearing about what was learned from that exercise.

- Ray Le Maistre, Editorial Director, TelecomTV 

Related Topics
  • Analysis & Opinion,
  • Cloud Native Telco,
  • Global,
  • GSMA,
  • Industry Associations,
  • News,
  • NFV,
  • Telco & CSP,
  • Telecoms Vendors & OEMs,
  • The Linux Foundation,
  • Virtualisation

More Like This

Spotlight on 5G

MWC23 interview: Adrian Scrase, CTO, ETSI

Mar 7, 2023

Open Networking

The Intel Network Builders Winners’ Circle Awards

Nov 29, 2022

AI, Analytics & Automation

Harnessing agility with HPE RAN automation

Jul 22, 2022

AI, Analytics & Automation

Transforming telcos to agile service providers with zero-touch automation

Jul 22, 2022

Digital Platforms and Services

ADVA’s Ensemble Activator network operating system scores industry first with MEF 3.0 certification

Mar 4, 2022

Email Newsletters

Stay up to date with the latest industry developments: sign up to receive TelecomTV's top news and videos plus exclusive subscriber-only content direct to your inbox – including our daily news briefing and weekly wrap.

Subscribe

Top Picks

Highlights of our content from across TelecomTV today

10:43

MWC23 interview: Mari-Noëlle Jégo-Laveissière, deputy CEO of Orange

12:45

MWC23 interview: Abdu Mudesir, Group CTO, Deutsche Telekom

9:26

MWC23 interview: Greg McCall, Chief Networks Officer, BT

TelecomTV
Company
  • About Us
  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us
Our Brands
  • DSP Leaders World Forum
  • Great Telco Debate
  • TelecomTV Events
Get In Touch
[email protected]
+44 (0) 207 448 1070
Connect With Us

  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms of Use
  • Legal Notices
  • Help

TelecomTV is produced by the team at Decisive Media.

© Decisive Media Limited 2023. All rights reserved. All brands and products are the trademarks of their respective holder(s).