TelecomTV TelecomTV
  • News
  • Videos
  • Channels
  • Events
  • Network Partners
  • Industry Insights
  • Directory
  • Newsletters
  • Open RAN
  • Digital Platforms and Services
  • 5G
  • Access Evolution
  • Private Networks
  • Cloud Native
  • Edge
  • Open Networking
  • Sustainability
  • AI, Analytics and Automation
  • 6G Research and Innovation
  • Security
  • More Topics
  • Network Partners
  • Industry Insights
  • Directory
  • Newsletters
  • |
  • About
  • Contact
  • |
  • Connect with us
  • 5G
  • 6G Research and Innovation
  • Access Evolution
  • AI, Analytics and Automation
  • Cloud Native
  • Digital Platforms and Services
  • Edge
  • Open Networking
  • Open RAN
  • Private Networks
  • Security
  • Sustainability
  • Connect with TelecomTV
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Help
  • Contact
  • Sign In Register Subscribe
    • Subscribe
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

5G

5G

Is Boris Johnson about to open the trapdoor on Huawei?

Ian Scales
By Ian Scales

Dec 6, 2019

via Flickr ©  shankar s (CC BY 2.0)

via Flickr © shankar s (CC BY 2.0)

  • UK has been procrastinating on the issue since at least April
  • But Trump is apparently not letting up, even though he’s about to be impeached
  • Can Boris keep blustering until Trump is gone?

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson may have been caught sniggering like a naughty schoolboy at the antics of President Donald J Trump this week at the NATO summit,  but he might have felt he was, however inadequately, getting his own back having just been leant on (again) by Trump over the Huawei question. You know the sort of thing: “Nice little trade agreement our officials are working on. Pity if anything was to happen to it.” 

In the event Boris showed up at a microphone and announced, in what The Guardian described as his strongest signal so far, that he is prepared to pull the trapdoor on Huawei.

Security concerns are paramount, he said when asked about how that big decision was going.

“I don’t want this country to be hostile to investment from overseas. On the other hand, we cannot prejudice our vital national security interests nor can we prejudice our ability to cooperate with other Five Eyes security partners. That will be the key criterion that informs our decision about Huawei.”

None of that makes any sense unless we factor in the spectre of Trump instructing Boris, Zelensky-fashion, to start making the appropriate “I’m going to ban them” noises.

There is no vital security interest requiring the removal of existing Huawei kit and the banning of any more. The experts have already decreed that careful inspection and monitoring of ALL equipment is a sensible way forward. No need to go bonkers over a  perceived threat from an unreliable source.

And how might having Huawei kit in parts of the 5G network prejudice ‘our ability to cooperate’ - unless the non-cooperation was coming from the other partners?

What’s clear is that Trump has been working on the other NATO members, not just his so called ‘Five Eyes’ security partners (Australia, Canada, UK and New Zealand). 

“I spoke to Italy, they look like they are not going to go forward with that. We spoke to other countries and they are not going to go forward,” The Guardian reported him as saying.

Then the usual gibberish: “Everybody I have spoken to is not going forward, but how many countries can I speak to? Am I going to call up and speak to the whole world? We are building it, we have started, but we are not using Huawei.”

I suppose we could see Boris’s ongoing procrastination over the issue as being quite heroic, given the circumstances. Presumably, when faced with pointed questions from Trump about Huawei, he blusters and stammers and ruffles his hair as a distraction, while Trump talks in disjointed sentences and plays his imaginary concertina. What a scene!

But has it occurred to anyone that Trump has another reason for trying to get his security and NATO partners to ban the mid-band-oriented Huawei 5G technology. 

It became apparent over the past couple of years that Trump feels quite strongly about ‘the race to 5G’. A national race is something he actually understands, especially when the US is losing. He will have had it explained to him that the Europeans have chosen Huawei (where they have) because Huawei has made mid-band its specialisation. 

To enforce a ban, as the mobile telcos have pointed out again and again, would put key European markets, especially Germany and the UK, years ‘behind’ on 5G. 

Perhaps we should have kept that to ourselves?

Related Topics
  • 5G,
  • Analysis & Opinion,
  • Europe,
  • Huawei,
  • Mobile,
  • News,
  • Spectrum,
  • Telco & CSP,
  • Telecoms Vendors & OEMs

More Like This

Sustainability

Rakuten Symphony pitches a pragmatic approach to telco sustainability

May 20, 2022

Access Evolution

The iliad Group keeps up its growth momentum in first-quarter 2022

May 20, 2022

5G

Canada bans Huawei and ZTE from 4G and 5G networks

May 20, 2022

Private Networks

Tele2 delivers 5G private network to X Shore’s factory in Nyköping, Sweden

May 20, 2022

5G

RAN Misses Estimates in 1Q 2022, According to Dell’Oro Group

May 19, 2022

Email Newsletters

Stay up to date with the latest industry developments: sign up to receive TelecomTV's top news and videos plus exclusive subscriber-only content direct to your inbox – including our daily news briefing and weekly wrap.

Subscribe

Top Picks

Highlights of our content from across TelecomTV today

16:19

AT&T Amy Zwarico on securing telco applications in the public cloud

35:55

The best use cases for telco/public cloud partnerships

13:58

Ahmed El Sayed on Vodafone’s ‘techco’ transformation

36:47

The role of 5G in private network innovation

TelecomTV
Company
  • About Us
  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us
Our Brands
  • DSP Leaders World Forum
  • Great Telco Debate
  • TelecomTV Events
Get In Touch
[email protected]
+44 (0) 207 448 1070
Connect With Us
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms of Use
  • Legal Notices
  • Help

TelecomTV is produced by the team at Decisive Media.

© Decisive Media Limited 2022. All rights reserved. All brands and products are the trademarks of their respective holder(s).