
via Flickr © Anne Worner (CC BY-SA 2.0)
How powerful and how valuable are the world’s telecoms-related brands? A consultancy called Brand Finance says it “puts thousands of the world’s top brands to the test including the top 500 telecom operators and the top 10 infrastructure brands.” It does this every year. So running into MWC is a good time to see who is up, who is down and who is nowhere.
The World’s Most Valuable Telecoms Brands (Top 10 Operators)
Rank 2016 | Rank 2015 | Brand | Domicile | Brand Value 2016 | Brand Rating 2016 | BV change | Brand Value 2015 | Brand Rating 2015 |
1 | 1 | Verizon | US | 63,116 | AAA- | 5% | 59,843 | AAA- |
2 | 2 | AT&T | US | 59,904 | AA+ | 2% | 58,820 | AA+ |
3 | 3 | China Mobile | China | 49,810 | AAA- | 4% | 47,916 | AAA- |
4 | 4 | T (Deutsche Telekom) | Germany | 33,194 | AA+ | 7% | 31,108 | AA+ |
5 | 5 | Vodafone | UK | 27,820 | AA+ | 2% | 27,287 | AA+ |
6 | 9 | SoftBank | Japan | 19,135 | AA | 19% | 16,039 | AA |
7 | 6 | Orange | France | 19,096 | AA+ | -4% | 19,867 | AA+ |
8 | 8 | BT | UK | 18,442 | AAA- | 14% | 16,175 | AAA- |
9 | 10 | NTT | Japan | 18,186 | AA | 23% | 14,734 | AA |
10 | New | Xfinity | US | 17,186 | AA+ | na | na | na |
The top 10 for both sides of the industry probably has few surprises. As happened last time, Verizon wins the operator Top 10 and is now well ahead of AT&T (Verizon’s acquisition of AOL was apparently deemed a brand-building plus - arguable). Deutsche Telekom is fourth behind China Mobile. Below Vodafone in position five the values plummet down to the late teens in $billions. Xfinity is a new entry at 10 and Softbank has dropped 3 places.
The World’s Most Valuable Telecoms Brands (Top 10 Infrastructure)
Rank 2016 | Rank 2015 | Brand | Domicile | Brand Value 2016 | Brand Rating 2016 | BV change | Brand Value 2015 | Brand Rating 2015 |
1 | 2 | Huawei | China | 19,743 | AA | 70% | 11,621 | AA |
2 | 1 | Cisco | US | 19,162 | AAA- | 17% | 16,339 | AAA- |
3 | 3 | Ericsson | Sweden | 9,445 | AA+ | 3% | 9,157 | AA+ |
4 | 4 | Qualcomm | US | 4,138 | AA | -17% | 4,994 | AA+ |
5 | 7 | Nokia | Finland | 3,039 | AA | 37% | 2,212 | AA- |
6 | 6 | ZTE | China | 2,992 | AA | -13% | 3,437 | AA |
7 | 5 | Alcatel-Lucent | France | 2,490 | AA- | -36% | 3,881 | AA |
8 | 8 | Corning | US | 1,861 | AA+ | -3% | 1,916 | AA+ |
9 | 10 | Harris Corp | US | 1,205 | AA- | 25% | 963 | AA |
10 | 9 | Juniper Networks | US | 1,116 | AA- | -34% | 1,691 | AA |
On the infrastructure side, Huawei is king of the hill, apparently on the back of soaring smartphone sales, according to Brand Finance, and has thus supplanted Cisco. Even though Nokia and Alcatel-Lucent are now one, Brand Finance has missed a trick by giving them separate rankings - it would have been interesting to see how much (or how little) difference their joint ranking has made.
So to make sense of the ranking you might want to know how Brand Finance rates brand value.
Methodology
A “brand is the focus for all the expectations and opinions held by customers, staff and other stakeholders about an organisation and its products and services,” it says. There’s actually a ISO standard for valuing brands (which Brand Finance claims it helped to craft), and that defines a brand as “a marketing-related intangible asset including, but not limited to, names, terms, signs, symbols, logos and designs, or a combination of these, intended to identify goods, services or entities, or a combination of these, creating distinctive images and associations in the minds of stakeholders, thereby generating economic benefits/value.”
Another way in to this is to define a ‘Brand Contribution’ as the total economic benefit that a business derives from its brand, from volume and price premiums over generic products to cost savings over less well-branded competitors.
That’s the brand ‘thing’ - how is the brand value calculated? Brand Finance says there are seven steps.
- Calculate brand strength on a scale of 0 to 100 based on a number of attributes such as emotional connection, financial performance and sustainability, among others. This score is known as the Brand Strength Index.
- Determine the royalty rate range for the respective brand sectors. This is done by reviewing comparable licensing agreements sourced from Brand Finance’s extensive database of license agreements and other online databases.
- Calculate royalty rate. The brand strength score is applied to the royalty rate range to arrive at a royalty rate. For example, if the royalty rate range in a brand’s sector is 0-5% and a brand has a brand strength score of 80 out of 100, then an appropriate royalty rate for the use of this brand in the given sector will be 4%.
- Determine brand specific revenues estimating a proportion of parent company revenues attributable to a specific brand.
- Determine forecast brand specific revenues using a function of historic revenues, equity analyst forecasts and economic growth rates.
- Apply the royalty rate to the forecast revenues to derive brand revenues.
- Brand revenues are discounted post tax to a net present value which equals the brand value.
There you have it. There seems to be a lot subjective wet finger waving if you ask me. Just don’t try steps 1 to 7 at home.
Email Newsletters
Sign up to receive TelecomTV's top news and videos, plus exclusive subscriber-only content direct to your inbox.