The FCC under chairman Julius Genachowski has yet to take up the firm Internet neutrality positions trailed before his appointment. Now the latest move by Comcast and its supporters to appeal the famous throttling censure delivered by the FCC last year, could make an enforceable policy (if it eventuates) even more difficult to engineer. By Ian Scales.
US cable company, Comcast, says it's going to appeal the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)'s order to halt "discriminatory network management practices", delivered against Comcast following the well-publicised fracas over Comcast's practise of "throttling" P2P Internet traffic (see - Throttling the Net American Style: Regulator chokes Comcast)
The trouble began back in 2007 when Comcast was caught "managing" BitTorrent traffic by forging packets to throttle torrents when the load became too great on the Comcast network.
The P2P BitTorrent file transfers overcome the asymmetric characteristics of both DSL and cable modem networks by simultaneously uploading separate segments of identical files (music or movie files, usually) hosted on end-user PCs. The multiple file technique avoids what would otherwise be an impossibly slow transfer time, but too much of this traffic causes congestion on the back-haul networks, claim ISPs, hence the need to throttle it at busy times. Standoff.
In the end Comcast admitted it was wrong and amended its management practises so that they were 'protocol agnostic'.
» This story continues on page 2. Please click here to read
please sign in to rate this article
45375