Connect
Related Content
Green Planet
Green Planet
What impact does ICT have on greenhouse gas emissions, energy use and the environment?
And what role can ICT play in helping alleviate the problems in other business areas?
TelecomTV One - News
 
Bookmark and Share

Proliferation of electronic surveillance put UK at Number 5 in global list of most repressive regimes. US at Number 8

Posted By Martyn Warwick , 02 June 2009 | 2 Comments | (0)
Tags: Surveillance Internet legislation

We have known - anecdotally and instinctively - for years now that the powers-that-be in Britain (but probably won't be powers-that-be for that much longer) have dedicated themselves to the construction of an electronic surveillance state that makes Orwell's 1984 look positively quaint by comparison, writes Martyn Warwick.

Now we have empiric proof of sinister intent. A new report, from the Internet security company, Cryptohippie, puts the UK at Number Five in the list of the world's most repressive regimes in terms of the electronic surveillance of its citizens.

The country that successfully fought-off totalitarianism in World War Two now finds itself lumped-in with the likes of China, North Korea, Belarus and Russia. We have collectively stood by in unthinking, uncritical acquiescence as the state has systematically dismantled and destroyed many of the liberties our fathers and grandfather's fought for and made untold sacrifices to secure and maintain. Haven't we done well?

Indeed things are now so bad that even a former head of MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove, the man who headed the UK's Secret Intelligence Service between 1999 and 2004, has been doing the media rounds to warn everyone that the now routine and all-pervasive surveillance to which we are all subject is "striking, disturbing" and "an abuse of human rights and the law". When that happens you know we are on the slippery slope to the "Big Brother" state.

Meanwhile, another pillar of the establishment, Lord Carlisle, has gone on the record to say that Home Office plans to impose a massive and pervasive Internet surveillance database that will monitor and maintain records of every Internet site visited, emails sent and received and phone calls made by every UK citizen is "a step too far for the British way of life".

The Cryptohippie survey, "The Electronic Police State 2008" is the first in a projected and ongoing series of annual reports analysing "the state use of electronic technologies to record, organise, search and distribute forensic evidence against its citizens".

In listing those countries in order of their repressive tendencies, Cryptohippe uses a 17-point scale ranging from the routine requirement for citizens to carry ID and produce it for inspection on demand all the way through to those regimes that compel ISPs and telcos to collect and store data and make it available for search and manipulation by various state agencies.

A five-point scoring system is used for each of the 17 factors and the most repressive states  are listed in order of their paranoia. At Number One is China, followed by North Korea, Belarus and Russia. As previously mentioned, the UK sits at Number Five, lumped in with the world's most totalitarian and repressive regimes. We are followed by France, Germany and - ominously - the US.


» This story continues on page 2. Please click here to read
Advertisement
please sign in to rate this article
45031
 

2 comments (Add Yours) - click here to sign in

(1) 02 June 2009 22:24:19 by sean bradley

I think the fact that electronic surveillance is used so much in the uk now, is that surveillance gathered from the setting up of a specific investigation of an individual (intercept evidence) is not admissible in court due to the human rights ramifications regarding privacy.
In order to overcome this, they record every detail they can about everybody whenever technology allows it. This kind of information is admissible in court. For some reason, your right to privacy is not a valid reason for preventing this kind of surveilance.


(2) 02 June 2009 22:43:46 by sean bradley

"Intercept evidence" is usually illegally obtained because the surveyee is unaware they are being serveyed. So i guess when the government and even private industry puts cameras and records your telephone numbers, email and internet activity, and they remind us about it all the time by shoving it in our faces, i guess they aren''t breaking the law.

Also, if the police knew you were doing something wrong and they set up surveillance on you, why didn''t they book you when they had the chance? Did they let you commit that crime?